Superhuman vs Shortwave vs Spike vs Front - Comparison

/ Article

We used Oden to analyze Superhuman, Shortwave, Spike, and Front across vendor sites, pricing pages, G2 reviews, Reddit threads, and third‑party write‑ups. If you’re drowning in notifications, juggling multiple inboxes, or trying to pick one tool for your team, the marketing pages alone won’t tell you which platform actually fits. Below, we break down real ratings, costs, features, and user feedback so you can make a practical, data‑driven choice—whether you’re an individual power user or a support team leader.

Which Email Client platform has the best rating?

Source for all ratings and review counts: G2 product pages as of November 2025. Source: G2 – Superhuman Mail, G2 – Shortwave, G2 – Spike, G2 – Front

Platform/ToolRating (G2)# Reviews (G2)Notes
Superhuman4.7 / 51,114Consistently praised for speed, keyboard shortcuts, and time‑saving workflows; some users note high price and learning curve. Source: G2 – Superhuman Mail
Shortwave4.4 / 568Strong AI and inbox organization, but much smaller sample size; some complaints about cost and Gmail dependency. Source: G2 – Shortwave
Spike4.6 / 5~250Users like the chat‑like inbox and unified email, but mention missing integrations and limitations for non‑English search. Source: G2 – Spike
Front4.7 / 52,375Very high rating at large scale, especially for team collaboration and shared inboxes in support and operations. Source: G2 – Front

Takeaways

  • Front and Superhuman are essentially tied at the top on G2 (4.7/5), but Front’s rating is based on more than double the number of reviews, mostly from support and customer‑facing teams rather than individual users. Source: G2 – Front, G2 – Superhuman Mail
  • Spike’s 4.6 rating with around 250 reviews suggests strong satisfaction for a more consumer‑/SMB‑oriented email and chat hybrid. Source: G2 – Spike
  • Shortwave’s 4.4 rating is solid, but with under 100 reviews; differences of a few tenths of a point here are not statistically strong compared with Superhuman or Front’s much larger sample sizes. Source: G2 – Shortwave
  • If you care about validation at scale (thousands of reviews), Front is the clear outlier; if you’re choosing a personal productivity client, Superhuman and Spike have the richest review histories.

How much do Email Client platforms really cost?

Platform/ToolFree/Trial tierMain billing unitsExample entry point
SuperhumanNo permanent free plan for Mail; free months often available via referrals and startup promos. Source: Superhuman Mail pricing plans, Superhuman Mail for startupsPer user / month (Mail Starter, Business, Enterprise)Starter plan at $30/user/month, Business at $40/user/month; annual plans discount to $300 and $396 per user respectively. Source: Superhuman Mail pricing plans, Superhuman Annual Plan
ShortwaveFree plan (1 user), plus paid Personal and Pro tiers; 14‑day trial for higher‑end business plans. Source: G2 – Shortwave pricing options, Shortwave pricing pageIndividual plans priced per user; business AI plans priced per seat / monthG2 lists Free, Personal at $7/user, and Pro at $18/user; site lists Business AI plans from $24/seat/month billed annually, Premier at $36, Max at $100. Source: G2 – Shortwave pricing options, Shortwave pricing page
SpikeFree plan with 1 email address and limited storage; paid Pro and Ultimate tiers. Source: Spike pricing pagePer user / month, with annual discountsPro at $5/user/month and Ultimate at $10/user/month when billed annually; free plan at $0 with reduced search history and storage. Source: Spike pricing page
Front14‑day free trial of Professional plan. Source: Front pricing pagePer seat / month with seat minimums and channel limitsStarter: $25/seat/month (up to 10 seats); Professional: $65/seat/month; Enterprise: $105/seat/month, all billed annually. Source: Front pricing page

Cost patterns

  • Superhuman is the priciest traditional email client here on a per‑user basis, positioned for high‑earning professionals and teams who can justify $30–40/month for speed and AI features. Source: Superhuman Mail pricing plans, Superhuman Mail product page
  • Shortwave undercuts Superhuman on individual pricing (from $7–18/user) while charging similar or higher rates for advanced AI business tiers, especially if you want Premier or Max AI capacity. Source: G2 – Shortwave pricing options, Shortwave pricing page
  • Spike is substantially cheaper than both Superhuman and Shortwave at $5–10/user/month annually, with a functional free plan—an attractive option if you need multiple accounts without enterprise‑level automation. Source: Spike pricing page, TechRadar – Spike review
  • Front is priced like a help desk / CX platform rather than a simple email client; Starter at $25/seat/month is competitive with other customer‑service tools, but usually overkill for solo users. Source: Front pricing page, Front shared inbox playbook

Pricing varies by region, billing cycle, occasional promotions, and custom contracts—especially for enterprise deals. Always double-check current prices with each vendor's calculator or sales team.

What are the key features of each platform?

Superhuman

Core positioning: AI‑native, ultra‑fast email for high‑performing individuals and teams using Gmail or Outlook. Source: Superhuman Mail product page

Key Features:

  • Split Inbox that automatically surfaces VIPs, teammates, and key tools so you can respond to what matters first. Source: Superhuman Mail product page
  • Superhuman AI for instant drafts, auto‑summaries on every conversation, and natural‑language search over your mailbox. Source: Superhuman Mail product page, Superhuman AI marketing page
  • Deep keyboard‑shortcut model (Gmail‑style plus custom commands) to reach Inbox Zero quickly; reviewers frequently cite speed and shortcuts as top benefits. Source: G2 – Superhuman Mail
  • Team collaboration via shared conversations and comments on live emails, so colleagues can discuss a thread without endless forwards. Source: Superhuman Mail product page
  • Read receipts and “recent opens” feed so you can follow up on sales or recruiting emails with perfect timing. Source: Superhuman Mail product page

Best For:

Shortwave

Core positioning: An AI‑first Gmail client that resurrects Google Inbox‑style bundles and turns your inbox into a todo‑centric workspace. Source: Introducing Shortwave – blog, Shortwave AI email page

Key Features:

Best For:

  • Ex‑Inbox‑by‑Gmail fans who want bundles, delivery schedules, and Google‑style organization back. Source: Shortwave Android launch blog
  • Technical professionals who like turning inbox items into structured todos with AI help.
  • Small teams heavily invested in Gmail who want modern AI automation but don’t need a full help desk.

Spike

Core positioning: A conversational email and team chat hub that makes email feel like messaging, with built‑in collaboration and AI. Source: Spike conversational email page, Spike App Store listing

Key Features:

Best For:

  • Small teams and freelancers who want one app for email, chat, and lightweight project collaboration.
  • Users overwhelmed by traditional email threads who prefer chat‑style messaging.
  • Price‑sensitive buyers who still want AI and multi‑account support.

Front

Core positioning: An AI‑powered customer operations platform that feels like email but behaves like a collaborative help desk across channels. Source: Front homepage, Front shared inbox solution

Key Features:

Best For:

  • Support, CX, and account‑management teams needing shared inboxes and omnichannel workflows.
  • Organizations replacing legacy help desks (like Zendesk) with something that feels more like email. Source: Front shared inbox management playbook
  • Mid‑market and enterprise teams that care about detailed routing, analytics, and AI‑assisted ticket handling.

What are the strengths and weaknesses of each platform?

Superhuman

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Shortwave

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

  • Several users complain that the most powerful AI labeling and automation are paywalled behind higher‑tier business plans even for individuals. Source: Reddit – Shortwave or Superhuman?
  • Some Reddit and early GMail‑power‑user feedback mention rough edges, such as limited rules, label syncing issues, or missing “power user” Gmail features (though many have improved over time). Source: Reddit – Shortwave email resurrect Inbox, Shortwave blog – feature updates
  • G2 cons mention Gmail dependency and some editing/compatibility limitations, which can be a non‑starter if you need Outlook or other providers. Source: G2 – Shortwave
  • Smaller review base than the others, so less battle‑tested at very large scale.

Spike

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

  • G2 reviewers and at least one detailed review highlight limitations in search for certain languages (e.g., Japanese), making Spike unusable as a sole client for those workflows. Source: G2 – Spike detailed reviews, G2 – Spike
  • Some users wish for deeper task‑management features or tighter integration with external PM/CRM tools. Source: G2 – Spike
  • Additional email addresses and some advanced capabilities require paid tiers; a few reviewers call it “expensive” relative to expectations for a mail app, though still cheaper than Superhuman. Source: G2 – Spike
  • As an all‑in‑one communication hub, it may feel “busy” if you just want a lean email client without chat, notes, or calls.

Front

Strengths:

  • Very strong for team collaboration: users consistently praise being able to assign conversations, leave internal comments, and avoid duplicate replies across a shared inbox. Source: G2 – Front, Front shared inbox management playbook
  • Omnichannel support (email, SMS, chat, social, WhatsApp, etc.) in one UI is a major draw versus traditional email clients. Source: Front homepage, Front omnichannel inbox page
  • G2 pros emphasize ease of use and low learning curve, especially for support teams moving from legacy help desks. Source: G2 – Front
  • Strong analytics, SLA tracking, and automation features help teams improve response times and customer satisfaction. Source: Front B2B tech industry page

Weaknesses:

  • Some users find building complex rules and automations tricky compared with what they can simulate via search filters; mis‑configured rules can behave unpredictably. Source: G2 – Front
  • UI updates occasionally introduce short‑term glitches or slowdowns according to several recent reviews. Source: G2 – Front
  • Pricing and seat minimums can be steep if you don’t have a sizable support or account‑management team. Source: Front pricing page, G2 – Front
  • For solo users who just want a better email client, Front’s focus on shared inboxes and CX workflows may feel like overkill.

How do these platforms position themselves?

Superhuman markets itself as “the most productive email app ever made” and emphasizes saving “4 hours per person every single week” through AI‑native triage, shortcuts, and splits for teams on Gmail and Outlook. Source: Superhuman Mail product page, Join Superhuman – AI email It targets high‑performing professionals, sales teams, and startups who see email speed as a competitive advantage, and its pending acquisition by Grammarly reinforces its role in a broader AI productivity stack. Source: The Verge – Grammarly to acquire Superhuman

Shortwave positions itself as a better, AI‑powered Gmail that brings order to inbox chaos with bundles, splits, and advanced automation, explicitly calling out that “the problem isn’t you – it’s your email client.” Source: Introducing Shortwave – blog Its marketing leans heavily on reclaiming Inbox‑by‑Gmail’s best ideas while layering on modern AI agents that can organize, write, and search your email for you, appealing to professionals and small teams overwhelmed by SaaS notifications. Source: Shortwave AI email – product page

Spike brands itself as “conversational email” that “looks like chat, works like email,” foregrounding people‑centric threads over subject‑based threads. Source: Spike conversational email page Its messaging stresses being a single workspace where email, team chat, notes, tasks, and calls come together, with AI helping summarize and draft messages, aimed at small businesses and neurodivergent or overloaded users who find traditional inboxes overwhelming. Source: Spike App Store listing, G2 – Spike

Front presents itself not as an email client but as a “customer operations platform” that combines the familiarity of email with the power of a modern help desk and AI. Source: Front homepage, Front B2B tech industry page The core narrative is about treating every customer like a VIP at scale, with omnichannel shared inboxes, automation, and analytics for support, CX, and account‑management teams in industries like SaaS, manufacturing, and professional services. Source: Front shared inbox solution, Front manufacturing industry page

Which platform should you choose?

Choose Superhuman If:

  1. You spend several hours per day in email and are willing to pay a premium for speed. You’ll get top‑tier keyboard shortcuts, split inboxes, and well‑integrated AI to compress triage time. Source: Superhuman Mail product page, G2 – Superhuman Mail
  2. Your team already uses Gmail or Outlook and wants a shared language around email workflows. Superhuman’s training and product design push everyone toward fast, consistent behaviors like reminders, snooze, and snippets. Source: Superhuman Mail product page
  3. You’re okay with higher subscription costs in exchange for measurable productivity gains. Many users report saving multiple hours each week; even price‑skeptical Reddit threads concede that, functionally, it’s “one level above” other clients. Source: G2 – Superhuman Mail, Reddit – Email client with split inboxes
  4. You don’t need omnichannel support in the same tool. If your communication is mostly email, with chat handled elsewhere (e.g., Slack), Superhuman’s single‑channel focus is a feature, not a bug.
  5. You want a client that’s likely to deepen its AI capabilities via Grammarly’s ecosystem over time. The acquisition indicates a long‑term bet on AI‑assisted communication inside and beyond email. Source: The Verge – Grammarly to acquire Superhuman

Choose Shortwave If:

  1. You loved Google Inbox and want its spiritual successor with modern AI. Bundles, delivery schedules, smart labels, and todo‑style inbox features bring back that experience, enhanced with LLM‑powered search and summaries. Source: Shortwave Android launch blog, Shortwave AI email – product page
  2. You want strong AI features on both desktop and mobile. Reddit users who use both tools note that Shortwave’s mobile app exposes more AI power than Superhuman’s mobile experience. Source: Reddit – Shortwave or Superhuman?
  3. You primarily use Gmail and don’t mind being tied to it. Shortwave shines when you can lean into Gmail labels, filters, and integrations; if you’re multi‑provider, it’s less ideal. Source: G2 – Shortwave
  4. You want a more flexible pricing ladder than Superhuman. Free, Personal, and Pro tiers let you start cheaply as an individual, then move into business AI plans as needed. Source: G2 – Shortwave pricing options, Shortwave pricing page
  5. Your workflow is task‑oriented. Turning emails into todos and managing them in‑place is central to Shortwave’s design, which pairs well with deep work and complex follow‑ups. Source: Shortwave AI email – product page

Choose Spike If:

  1. You want email that feels like chat. If long subject‑based threads stress you out, Spike’s people‑centric, conversational UI can make inbox processing feel more natural. Source: Spike conversational email page
  2. You’re looking for an all‑in‑one communication hub for a small team. Email, internal chat, notes, tasks, and calls all live in the same app, which many small businesses appreciate. Source: Spike App Store listing, G2 – Spike
  3. Your budget is constrained but you still want AI and multi‑account support. At $5–10/user/month, Spike is far cheaper than Superhuman while still offering AI summarization and replies. Source: Spike pricing page, TechRadar – Spike review
  4. You and your team work across many devices and providers. Spike supports a wide range of email services and has mature apps on all major platforms. Source: Spike (application) – Wikipedia, Spike App Store listing
  5. Your audience is primarily in languages and workflows Spike handles well. If you rely heavily on advanced search in languages like Japanese, user reports suggest pairing Spike with another client. Source: G2 – Spike detailed review

Choose Front If:

  1. You run a support, CX, or operations team that lives in shared inboxes. Front is built to manage group addresses (support@, sales@) and multi‑person workflows, not just personal email. Source: Front shared inbox management playbook
  2. You need omnichannel communication in one place. If your customers contact you via email, SMS, chat, social, and WhatsApp, Front’s unified inbox is far more appropriate than any traditional email client. Source: Front homepage, Front omnichannel inbox page
  3. You care about SLAs, analytics, and AI‑assisted routing. Front’s Topics, Copilot, and Autopilot, plus reporting, give you help‑desk‑grade insight into response times and customer satisfaction. Source: Front homepage, Front blog – customer service automation
  4. You have 5–10+ agents and can justify help‑desk‑level pricing. Plans start at $25/seat/month with seat minimums; ROI comes from faster responses and improved CX, not personal inbox speed. Source: Front pricing page, G2 – Front
  5. You want to move off a clunky traditional help desk without losing structure. Teams migrating from Zendesk and similar tools often report better collaboration and usability with Front. Source: Front shared inbox management playbook, Front B2B tech industry page

Company Websites

Pricing Pages

Documentation

G2 Review Pages

Reddit Discussions

Additional Resources